Decalyst vs Windsurf

Windsurf is Codeium's native IDE featuring the Cascade agent with Flow mode. Subscription-based with included credits, supports BYOK on some plans, VS Code fork. Best for users who want Cascade's flow experience and Codeium's ecosystem.

Pick Decalyst if:

You prefer flexible per-request billing over monthly subscriptions or want security scanning on every diff.

Pick Windsurf if:

You want Cascade's Flow agent, are comfortable with VS Code fork, and prefer monthly subscription billing.

DimensionDecalystWindsurf
Pricing modelCredits, $1 buys 500 credits, no feature gatesSubscription with included credits, Flow mode unlocked at higher tiers
BYOK LLM keysYes, zero markup on every tierBYOK supported on select plans, varies by tier
Local model supportEmbeddings local, generation hosted on DigitalOcean inferenceLimited local model integration, primarily Codeium-hosted generation
Security scan on every diffYes, 20-point scanner included on FreeNo built-in security scanning
IDE depthNative desktop (Tauri 2 + Monaco)VS Code fork with Cascade agent and Flow mode
Agent specialization9 named agents (Dispatch, Echo, Lens, Chuck, Scout, Nova, Forge, Hawk, Pixel)Cascade agent with Flow mode for multi-step reasoning and streaming edits
TelemetryOpt-in onlyTelemetry enabled by default (can be configured)
When to pickPer-request billing, security-first, fresh IDE architectureFlow agent experience, VS Code fork comfort, predictable subscription cost

Pricing

Windsurf uses a subscription model with included credits; Flow mode is unlocked at higher subscription tiers. You pay a monthly fee regardless of usage. Decalyst uses flexible credits (500 per $1) with no tier-based feature gates, so you pay only for what you use and can scale down without commitment.

BYOK and key handling

Windsurf supports BYOK on select subscription plans, though availability varies by tier (check Codeium docs for current details). Decalyst supports BYOK on every tier with zero markup. If key management and avoiding vendor lock-in are priorities, Decalyst is more flexible.

Local vs hosted models

Windsurf is primarily Codeium-hosted generation with limited local model integration. Decalyst runs embeddings locally and generation on DigitalOcean inference. Neither fully supports private on-device inference like Ollama or LM Studio for the main agent; Cline and Aider do.

Security review on every diff

Windsurf has no built-in security scanner. Decalyst includes a 20-point security scanner on every diff across all tiers, automatically catching injection, XSS, secrets, and more without additional cost.

IDE depth and architecture

Windsurf is a VS Code fork with Cascade agent and Flow mode for streaming multi-step edits. Decalyst is a native desktop app (Tauri 2 + Monaco) with a fresh architecture and 9 specialized agents. Windsurf will feel familiar if you use VS Code; Decalyst offers a cleaner slate.

Telemetry and privacy posture

Windsurf collects telemetry by default, with some configuration available. Decalyst is opt-in only: no telemetry without your explicit consent. Both are commercial; review Codeium and Decalyst privacy policies for details on data retention and third-party sharing.

When to pick which

Pick Windsurf if you want Cascade's Flow mode and are comfortable with a VS Code fork. Pick Decalyst for flexible per-request billing, always-on security scanning, and fresh native IDE architecture.

Related comparisons

  • Decalyst vs Cursor
  • Decalyst vs GitHub Copilot

Read more

  • Windsurf Pricing
  • Windsurf Docs
  • Decalyst pricing
  • Decalyst security scanner